Short-step Methods Are Not Strongly Polynomial-Time
Manru Zong, Yin Tat Lee, Man-Chung Yue

TL;DR
This paper demonstrates that under mild assumptions, short-step interior-point methods for convex optimization are not strongly polynomial-time, highlighting limitations in their efficiency.
Contribution
It provides a theoretical proof that short-step interior-point methods cannot achieve strong polynomiality under mild conditions.
Findings
Short-step methods are not strongly polynomial-time.
The proof relies on mild assumptions about the barrier and neighborhood width.
Highlights limitations of certain interior-point algorithms.
Abstract
Short-step methods are an important class of algorithms for solving convex constrained optimization problems. In this short paper, we show that under very mild assumptions on the self-concordant barrier and the width of the -neighbourhood, any short-step interior-point method is not strongly polynomial-time.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsStochastic Gradient Optimization Techniques · Advanced Optimization Algorithms Research · Complexity and Algorithms in Graphs
