Building Human-like Communicative Intelligence: A Grounded Perspective

TL;DR

This paper advocates for a grounded, embodied approach to developing human-like communicative AI, emphasizing real-world interaction, active exploration, and environmental feedback to overcome current limitations in language generalization and semantic understanding.

Contribution

It critiques existing cognitively-inspired AI paradigms and proposes a grounded, 4E cognition-based framework with concrete components for advancing linguistic intelligence in machines.

Findings

Grounded AI can improve language generalization and semantic understanding.

Active exploration and embodiment are crucial for naturalistic language development.

Environmental feedback enhances adaptive language learning in AI systems.

Abstract

Modern Artificial Intelligence (AI) systems excel at diverse tasks, from image classification to strategy games, even outperforming humans in many of these domains. After making astounding progress in language learning in the recent decade, AI systems, however, seem to approach the ceiling that does not reflect important aspects of human communicative capacities. Unlike human learners, communicative AI systems often fail to systematically generalize to new data, suffer from sample inefficiency, fail to capture common-sense semantic knowledge, and do not translate to real-world communicative situations. Cognitive Science offers several insights on how AI could move forward from this point. This paper aims to: (1) suggest that the dominant cognitively-inspired AI directions, based on nativist and symbolic paradigms, lack necessary substantiation and concreteness to guide progress in modern AI, and (2) articulate an alternative, "grounded", perspective on AI advancement, inspired by Embodied, Embedded, Extended, and Enactive Cognition (4E) research. I review results on 4E research lines in Cognitive Science to distinguish the main aspects of naturalistic learning conditions that play causal roles for human language development. I then use this analysis to propose a list of concrete, implementable components for building "grounded" linguistic intelligence. These components include embodying machines in a perception-action cycle, equipping agents with active exploration mechanisms so they can build their own curriculum, allowing agents to gradually develop motor abilities to promote piecemeal language development, and endowing the agents with adaptive feedback from their physical and social environment. I hope that these ideas can direct AI research towards building machines that develop human-like language abilities through their experiences with the world.