Quantifying unsharpness of observables in an outcome-independent way
Arindam Mitra

TL;DR
This paper introduces new outcome-independent measures of the unsharpness of quantum observables, establishes their properties, and explores their experimental determination and resource-theoretic implications.
Contribution
It develops novel Luder's instrument-based and instrument-independent unsharpness measures, proving their bounds, monotonicity, and experimental accessibility, advancing the resource theory of observable sharpness.
Findings
Constructed tight upper bounds for unsharpness measures
Proved monotonicity under fuzzifying processes
Demonstrated experimental determination of measures
Abstract
Recently, a very beautiful measure of the unsharpness (fuzziness) of the observables is discussed in the paper [Phys. Rev. A 104, 052227 (2021)]. The measure which is defined in this paper is constructed via uncertainty and does not depend on the values of the outcomes. There exist several properties of a set of observables (e.g., incompatibility, non-disturbance) that do not depend on the values of the outcomes. Therefore, the approach in the above-said paper is consistent with the above-mentioned fact and is able to measure the intrinsic unsharpness of the observables. In this work, we also quantify the unsharpness of observables in an outcome-independent way. But our approach is different than the approach of the above-said paper. In this work, at first, we construct two Luder's instrument-based unsharpness measures and provide the tight upper bounds of those measures. Then we prove…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsQuantum Information and Cryptography · Quantum Mechanics and Applications · Advanced Thermodynamics and Statistical Mechanics
