The structure of $^{36}$Ca under the Coulomb magnifying glass
L. Lalanne, O. Sorlin, A. Poves, M. Assi\'e, F. Hammache, S. Koyama,, F. Flavigny, V. Girard-Alcindor, A. Lemasson, A. Matta, T. Roger, D. Beaumel,, Y Blumenfeld, B. A. Brown, F. De Oliveira Santos, F. Delaunay, N. de, S\'er\'eville, S. Franchoo, J. Gibelin, J. Guillot

TL;DR
This study provides detailed spectroscopy of $^{36}$Ca, revealing unique energy shifts, an intruder 0$^+_2$ state below the 2$^+$ state, and the largest mirror energy differences observed, highlighting the effects of Coulomb interactions.
Contribution
It reports the first detailed spectroscopy of $^{36}$Ca, discovering an intruder 0$^+_2$ state below the 2$^+$ state and quantifying the largest mirror energy differences, advancing understanding of Coulomb effects.
Findings
Discovery of an intruder 0$^+_2$ state at 2.83 MeV
Observation of a large mirror energy difference of -516 keV
Shell Model calculations support an intruder state with proton/neutron excitations
Abstract
Detailed spectroscopy of the neutron-deficient nucleus Ca was obtained up to 9 MeV using the Ca(,)Ca and the Ca(,)Ca transfer reactions. The radioactive nuclei, produced by the LISE spectrometer at GANIL, interacted with the protons of the liquid Hydrogen target CRYPTA, to produce light ejectiles (the deuteron or triton ) that were detected in the MUST2 detector array, in coincidence with the heavy residues %identified by a zero degree detection system. %States have been measured up to 9 MeV. Our main findings are: i) a similar shift in energy for the 1 and 2 states by about -250 keV, as compared to the mirror nucleus S, ii) the discovery of an intruder 0 state at 2.83(13) MeV, which appears below the first 2 state, in contradiction with the situation in S, and iii) a tentative 0 state at…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
