The MAVERIC Survey: The first radio and X-ray limits on the detached black holes in NGC 3201
Alessandro Paduano, Arash Bahramian, James C. A. Miller-Jones, Adela, Kawka, Fabian G\"ottgens, Jay Strader, Laura Chomiuk, Sebastian Kamann,, Stefan Dreizler, Craig O. Heinke, Tim-Oliver Husser, Thomas J. Maccarone,, Evangelia Tremou, and Yue Zhao

TL;DR
This study uses radio and X-ray observations from the MAVERIC survey to set the first limits on accretion activity of confirmed black holes in NGC 3201, revealing extremely low accretion efficiencies and expanding multiwavelength source catalogs.
Contribution
It provides the first radio and X-ray limits on black holes in NGC 3201 and integrates multiwavelength data to analyze cluster sources and populations.
Findings
No radio or X-ray detection of the black holes, indicating very low accretion rates.
Constraints on accretion efficiency, with radiative efficiency ≤ 1.5×10⁻⁵ for one system.
Identification of a new red straggler with X-ray emission and analysis of sub-subgiant populations.
Abstract
The Galactic globular cluster NGC 3201 is the first Galactic globular cluster observed to host dynamically-confirmed stellar-mass black holes, containing two confirmed and one candidate black hole. This result indicates that globular clusters can retain black holes, which has important implications for globular cluster evolution. NGC 3201 has been observed as part of the MAVERIC survey of Galactic globular clusters. We use these data to confirm that there is no radio or X-ray detection of the three black holes, and present the first radio and X-ray limits on these sources. These limits indicate that any accretion present is at an extremely low rate and may be extremely inefficient. In particular, for the system ACS ID #21859, by assuming the system is tidally locked and any accretion is through the capture of the companion's winds, we constrain the radiative efficiency of any accretion…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
