Exploring Longitudinal Cough, Breath, and Voice Data for COVID-19 Progression Prediction via Sequential Deep Learning: Model Development and Validation

TL;DR

This study develops a sequential deep learning model using longitudinal audio data to predict COVID-19 progression and recovery, demonstrating promising accuracy and correlation with test results.

Contribution

It introduces a novel approach leveraging longitudinal audio biomarkers and GRUs for continuous COVID-19 progression monitoring, which was not previously explored.

Findings

Achieved AUROC of 0.79 for COVID-19 detection.

Predicted disease progression with high correlation to test results.

Showed potential for tracking COVID-19 recovery through audio data.

Abstract

Recent work has shown the potential of using audio data (eg, cough, breathing, and voice) in the screening for COVID-19. However, these approaches only focus on one-off detection and detect the infection given the current audio sample, but do not monitor disease progression in COVID-19. Limited exploration has been put forward to continuously monitor COVID-19 progression, especially recovery, through longitudinal audio data. Tracking disease progression characteristics could lead to more timely treatment. The primary objective of this study is to explore the potential of longitudinal audio samples over time for COVID-19 progression prediction and, especially, recovery trend prediction using sequential deep learning techniques. Crowdsourced respiratory audio data, including breathing, cough, and voice samples, from 212 individuals over 5-385 days were analyzed. We developed a deep learning-enabled tracking tool using gated recurrent units (GRUs) to detect COVID-19 progression by exploring the audio dynamics of the individuals' historical audio biomarkers. The investigation comprised 2 parts: (1) COVID-19 detection in terms of positive and negative (healthy) tests, and (2) longitudinal disease progression prediction over time in terms of probability of positive tests. The strong performance for COVID-19 detection, yielding an AUROC of 0.79, a sensitivity of 0.75, and a specificity of 0.71 supported the effectiveness of the approach compared to methods that do not leverage longitudinal dynamics. We further examined the predicted disease progression trajectory, displaying high consistency with test results with a correlation of 0.75 in the test cohort and 0.86 in a subset of the test cohort who reported recovery. Our findings suggest that monitoring COVID-19 evolution via longitudinal audio data has potential in the tracking of individuals' disease progression and recovery.