Phase diagram of nickelate superconductors calculated by dynamical vertex approximation
Karsten Held, Liang Si, Paul Worm, Oleg Janson, Ryotaro Arita,, Zhicheng Zhong, Jan M. Tomczak, Motoharu Kitatani

TL;DR
This paper models nickelate superconductors using a minimal one-band Hubbard model with an electron reservoir, accurately predicting the superconducting phase diagram and effects of pressure, aligning well with experimental data.
Contribution
It introduces a minimal one-band Hubbard model with an electron reservoir for nickelates, successfully predicting the superconducting phase diagram and effects of pressure.
Findings
The minimal model accurately predicts the $T_c$ vs. doping phase diagram.
Superconducting $T_c$ is enhanced under pressure or strain.
The physics is dominated by the Ni 3$d_{x^2-y^2}$ orbital and an electron reservoir.
Abstract
We review the electronic structure of nickelate superconductors with and without effects of electronic correlations. As a minimal model we identify the one-band Hubbard model for the Ni 3 orbital plus a pocket around the -momentum. The latter however merely acts as a decoupled electron reservoir. This reservoir makes a careful translation from {nominal} Sr-doping to the doping of the one-band Hubbard model mandatory. Our dynamical mean-field theory calculations, in part already supported by experiment, indicate that the pocket, Nd 4 orbitals, oxygen 2 and {the} other Ni 3 orbitals are not relevant in the superconducting doping regime. The physics is completely different if topotactic hydrogen is present or the oxygen reduction is incomplete. Then, a two-band physics hosted by the Ni 3 and 3 orbitals emerges. Based on our…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
