Quantifying Uncertainty in Deep Learning Approaches to Radio Galaxy Classification

TL;DR

This paper uses variational inference to quantify uncertainty in deep learning radio galaxy classification, showing correlations with human labels, exploring pruning and calibration, and discussing the cold posterior effect.

Contribution

It introduces a Bayesian approach to quantify uncertainty, analyzes pruning strategies, and investigates the cold posterior effect in radio galaxy classification.

Findings

Model posterior variance correlates with human uncertainty.

Sparse priors yield better uncertainty calibration.

Pruning 30% of weights maintains performance.

Abstract

In this work we use variational inference to quantify the degree of uncertainty in deep learning model predictions of radio galaxy classification. We show that the level of model posterior variance for individual test samples is correlated with human uncertainty when labelling radio galaxies. We explore the model performance and uncertainty calibration for different weight priors and suggest that a sparse prior produces more well-calibrated uncertainty estimates. Using the posterior distributions for individual weights, we demonstrate that we can prune 30% of the fully-connected layer weights without significant loss of performance by removing the weights with the lowest signal-to-noise ratio. A larger degree of pruning can be achieved using a Fisher information based ranking, but both pruning methods affect the uncertainty calibration for Fanaroff-Riley type I and type II radio galaxies differently. Like other work in this field, we experience a cold posterior effect, whereby the posterior must be down-weighted to achieve good predictive performance. We examine whether adapting the cost function to accommodate model misspecification can compensate for this effect, but find that it does not make a significant difference. We also examine the effect of principled data augmentation and find that this improves upon the baseline but also does not compensate for the observed effect. We interpret this as the cold posterior effect being due to the overly effective curation of our training sample leading to likelihood misspecification, and raise this as a potential issue for Bayesian deep learning approaches to radio galaxy classification in future.