Experimental secure quantum key distribution in presence of polarization-dependent loss
Chunfeng Huang, Ye Chen, Long Jin, Minming Geng, Junwei Wang, Zhenrong, Zhang, and Kejin Wei

TL;DR
This paper experimentally investigates polarization-dependent loss in practical QKD devices, demonstrating its impact on security and key rate estimation, and reports a secure decoy-state BB84 QKD implementation over 75 km fiber considering realistic device flaws.
Contribution
It provides the first experimental characterization of polarization-dependent loss in realistic QKD devices and incorporates this into a finite-key security analysis for practical fiber links.
Findings
Significant polarization-dependent loss found in fiber- and silicon-based modulators.
Overestimation of secure key rate occurs if polarization-dependent loss is ignored.
Achieved secure QKD over 75 km fiber considering realistic device imperfections.
Abstract
Quantum key distribution (QKD) is theoretically secure using the principle of quantum mechanics; therefore, QKD is a promising solution for the future of secure communication. Although several experimental demonstrations of QKD have been reported, they have not considered the polarization-dependent loss in state preparation in the key-rate estimation. In this study, we experimentally characterized polarization-dependent loss in realistic state-preparation devices and verified that a considerable PDL exists in fiber- and silicon-based polarization modulators. Hence, the security of such QKD systems is compromised because of the secure key rate overestimation. Furthermore, we report a decoy-state BB84 QKD experiment considering polarization-dependent loss. Finally, we achieved rigorous finite-key security bound over up to 75 km fiber links by applying a recently proposed security proof.…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
