Detailed Chemical Abundances for a Benchmark Sample of M Dwarfs from the APOGEE Survey
Diogo Souto, Katia Cunha, Verne V. Smith, D. A. Garc\'ia-Hern\'andez,, Jon A. Holtzman, Henrik J\"onsson, Suvrath Mahadevan, Steven R. Majewski,, Thomas Masseron, Marc Pinsonneault, Donald P. Schneider, Matthew Shetrone,, Keivan G. Stassun, Ryan Terrien, Olga Zamora

TL;DR
This study derives detailed chemical abundances for a sample of M-dwarfs using high-resolution near-infrared spectra from APOGEE, demonstrating their reliability for Galactic chemical evolution studies and calibration of empirical relationships.
Contribution
It provides the first detailed chemical abundance analysis of M-dwarfs from APOGEE spectra, validating their use in Galactic studies and comparing results with primary stars and pipelines.
Findings
M-dwarfs in binary systems have consistent abundances with primaries (<0.08 dex difference)
APOGEEs spectra can reliably trace Galactic chemical evolution for M-dwarfs
Systematic offsets exist between this study and ASPCAP pipeline results
Abstract
Individual chemical abundances for fourteen elements (C, O, Na, Mg, Al, Si, K, Ca, Ti, V, Cr, Mn, Fe, and Ni) are derived for a sample of M-dwarfs using high-resolution near-infrared -band spectra from the SDSS-IV/APOGEE survey. The quantitative analysis included synthetic spectra computed with 1-D LTE plane-parallel MARCS models using the APOGEE DR17 line list to determine chemical abundances. The sample consists of eleven M-dwarfs in binary systems with warmer FGK-dwarf primaries and ten measured interferometric angular diameters. To minimize atomic diffusion effects, [X/Fe] ratios are used to compare M-dwarfs in binary systems and literature results for their warmer primary stars, indicating good agreement (0.08 dex) for all studied elements. The mean abundance differences in Primaries-this work M-dwarfs is -0.050.03 dex. It indicates that M-dwarfs in binary systems are a…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
