The dynamics and outcome of star formation with jets, radiation, winds, and supernovae in concert

TL;DR

This study presents a comprehensive simulation of giant molecular cloud evolution, capturing star formation and feedback processes like jets, radiation, winds, and supernovae, revealing their combined impact on cloud dispersal and star cluster properties.

Contribution

First GMC simulation to include detailed feedback physics, showing how multiple feedback mechanisms influence star formation efficiency and cluster evolution.

Findings

Jets dominate early feedback momentum.

Radiation and winds disperse the cloud at 8% SFE.

Supernovae occur too late to significantly affect star formation.

Abstract

We analyze the first giant molecular cloud (GMC) simulation to follow the formation of individual stars and their feedback from jets, radiation, winds, and supernovae, using the STARFORGE framework in the GIZMO code. We evolve the GMC for $\sim 9 \rm Myr$, from initial turbulent collapse to dispersal by feedback. Protostellar jets dominate feedback momentum initially, but radiation and winds cause cloud disruption at $\sim 8\%$ star formation efficiency (SFE), and the first supernova at $8.3 \rm Myr$ comes too late to influence star formation significantly. The per-freefall SFE is dynamic, accelerating from 0 to $\sim 18\%$ before dropping quickly to <1%, but the estimate from YSO counts compresses it to a narrower range. The primary cluster forms hierarchically and condenses to a brief ($\sim 1\,\mathrm{Myr}$) compact ($\sim 1 \rm pc$) phase, but does not virialize before the cloud disperses, and the stars end as an unbound expanding association. The initial mass function resembles the Chabrier (2005) form with a high-mass slope $\alpha=-2$ and a maximum mass of $55 M_\odot$. Stellar accretion takes $\sim 400 \rm kyr$ on average, but $\gtrsim 1\rm Myr$ for $>10 M_\odot$ stars, so massive stars finish growing latest. The fraction of stars in multiples increases as a function of primary mass, as observed. Overall, the simulation much more closely resembles reality, compared to variations which neglect different feedback physics entirely. But more detailed comparison with synthetic observations is necessary to constrain the theoretical uncertainties.