The validity of bootstrap testing in the threshold framework
Simone Giannerini, Greta Goracci, Anders Rahbek

TL;DR
This paper introduces a bootstrap-based testing method for threshold effects in non-linear autoregressive models, demonstrating its validity and improved finite-sample performance over traditional asymptotic tests.
Contribution
It proposes a new supremum Lagrange Multiplier test with a recursive bootstrap, providing theoretical validation and practical advantages for small samples and non-stationary data.
Findings
Bootstrap test maintains correct size in small samples
No power loss compared to asymptotic tests
Performance unaffected by autoregression order estimation
Abstract
We consider bootstrap-based testing for threshold effects in non-linear threshold autoregressive (TAR) models. It is well-known that classic tests based on asymptotic theory tend to be oversized in the case of small, or even moderate sample sizes, or when the estimated parameters indicate non-stationarity, as often witnessed in the analysis of financial or climate data. To address the issue we propose a supremum Lagrange Multiplier test statistic (sLMb), where the null hypothesis specifies a linear autoregressive (AR) model against the alternative of a TAR model. We consider a recursive bootstrap applied to the sLMb statistic and establish its validity. This result is new, and requires the proof of non-standard results for bootstrap analysis in time series models; this includes a uniform bootstrap law of large numbers and a bootstrap functional central limit theorem. These new results…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsComplex Systems and Time Series Analysis · Climate Change Policy and Economics · Climate variability and models
