The empire strikes back: Some responses to Bruineberg and colleagues
Maxwell J. D. Ramstead

TL;DR
This paper critically examines the philosophical and formal aspects of the free-energy principle, focusing on distinctions made by Bruineberg et al. and their implications for scientific inference.
Contribution
It offers a critical analysis of the distinctions between Pearl blankets and Friston blankets, and between inference with and within a model, within the context of the free-energy principle.
Findings
Highlights the philosophical implications of the free-energy principle.
Challenges the distinction between different types of inference.
Provides insights into the formal constructs of the free-energy framework.
Abstract
In their target paper, Bruineberg and colleagues provide us with a timely opportunity to discuss the formal constructs and philosophical implications of the free-energy principle. I critically discuss their proposed distinction between Pearl blankets and Friston blankets. I then critically assess the distinction between inference with a model and inference within a model in light of instrumentalist approaches to science.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsPhilosophy and History of Science · Science and Climate Studies · Quantum Mechanics and Applications
