A comment and erratum on "Excess Optimism: How Biased is the Apparent Error of an Estimator Tuned by SURE?"
Maxime Cauchois, Alnur Ali, and John Duchi

TL;DR
This paper corrects an error in a previous work on the bias of SURE-tuned estimators, providing new theoretical guarantees and oracle inequalities for their excess degrees of freedom.
Contribution
It identifies and rectifies an error in prior analysis, enabling accurate bounds on the bias of SURE-tuned linear estimators.
Findings
New guarantees on excess degrees of freedom for SURE-tuned estimators
Oracle inequalities derived for linear estimators
Improved understanding of bias in SURE-based model selection
Abstract
We identify and correct an error in the paper "Excess Optimism: How Biased is the Apparent Error of an Estimator Tuned by SURE?" This correction allows new guarantees on the excess degrees of freedom--the bias in the error estimate of Stein's unbiased risk estimate (SURE) for an estimator tuned by directly minimizing the SURE criterion--for arbitrary SURE-tuned linear estimators. Oracle inequalities follow as a consequence of these results for such estimators.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsProbabilistic and Robust Engineering Design · Advanced Statistical Methods and Models · Statistical Distribution Estimation and Applications
