Does relativistic cosmology software handle emergent volume evolution?
Justyna Borkowska, Boudewijn F. Roukema

TL;DR
This study evaluates whether relativistic cosmology software accurately models emergent volume evolution by comparing numerical results with exact solutions, confirming the reliability of inhomog and gevolution in specific scenarios.
Contribution
It introduces a method to test the accuracy of relativistic cosmology software in modeling volume evolution using exact perturbed solutions.
Findings
inhomog accurately models emergent volume evolution at first order.
inhomog matches Friedmann solutions within 0.006% for specified initial conditions.
gevolution models decaying modes with high accuracy, excluding growing modes by design.
Abstract
Several software packages for relativistic cosmological simulations that do not fully implement the Einstein equation have recently been developed. Two of the free-licensed ones are inhomog and gevolution. A key question is whether globally emergent volume evolution that is faster than that of a Friedmannian reference model results from the averaged effects of structure formation. Checking that emergent volume evolution is correctly modelled by the packages is thus needed. We numerically replace the software's default random realisation of initial seed fluctuations by a fluctuation of spatially constant amplitude in a simulation's initial conditions. The average volume evolution of the perturbed model should follow that of a Friedmannian expansion history that corresponds to the original Friedmannian reference solution modified by the insertion of the spatially constant perturbation. We…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
