On the Equivalence of Two Competing Affirmative Actions in School Choice
Yun Liu

TL;DR
This paper examines the conditions under which two different affirmative action policies in school choice, majority quota and minority reserve, produce identical outcomes, highlighting their equivalence in certain market scenarios.
Contribution
It demonstrates the outcome equivalence of two popular affirmative actions under specific market conditions using the student optimal stable mechanism.
Findings
Outcome equivalence holds in effectively competitive markets.
Outcome equivalence holds when many schools are present.
The policies generate identical matchings under these conditions.
Abstract
This note analyzes the outcome equivalence conditions of two popular affirmative action policies, majority quota and minority reserve, under the student optimal stable mechanism. These two affirmative actions generate an identical matching outcome, if the market either is effectively competitive or contains a sufficiently large number of schools.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsGame Theory and Voting Systems · Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth · School Choice and Performance
