Publication and collaboration anomalies in academic papers originating from a paper mill: evidence from a Russia-based paper mill
Anna Abalkina

TL;DR
This study identifies and analyzes publication and collaboration anomalies in papers from a Russia-based paper mill, revealing suspicious patterns, potential forgeries, and the scale of the issue across multiple countries and journals.
Contribution
It provides the first detailed analysis of a specific paper mill's publications, highlighting collaboration anomalies and estimating the economic scale of the misconduct.
Findings
434 papers potentially linked to the paper mill
Suspicious collaboration patterns across 39 countries
Estimated $6.5 million value of coauthorship slots
Abstract
This study attempts to detect papers originating from the Russia-based paper mill International publisher LLC. A total of 1009 offers published during 2019-2021 on the 123mi.ru website were analysed. The study allowed us to identify at least 434 papers that are potentially linked to the paper mill including one preprint, a duplication paper and 15 republications of papers erroneously published in hijacked journals. Evidence of suspicious provenance from the paper mill is provided: matches in title, number of coauthorship slots, year of publication, country of the journal, country of a coauthorship slot and similarities of abstracts. These problematic papers are coauthored by scholars associated with at least 39 countries and submitted both to predatory and reputable journals. This study also demonstrates collaboration anomalies and the phenomenon of suspicious collaboration in…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
