Identifying the leading dynamics of ubiquitin: a comparison between the tICA and the LE4PD slow fluctuations in amino acids' position
Eric Beyerle, Marina Guenza

TL;DR
This paper compares two methods, tICA and LE4PD, for identifying slow, large-scale fluctuations in protein dynamics from MD simulations, highlighting their similarities and differences in capturing kinetic processes.
Contribution
The study provides a detailed comparison between tICA and LE4PD methods, revealing their respective strengths in analyzing protein slow fluctuations and kinetic processes.
Findings
Both methods identify similar slow fluctuation processes.
tICA uses fewer modes to describe slow dynamics.
LE4PD offers time-dependent and physically grounded insights.
Abstract
Molecular Dynamics (MD) simulations of proteins implicitly contain the information connecting the atomistic molecular structure and proteins' biologically relevant motion, where large-scale fluctuations are deemed to guide folding and function. In the complex multiscale processes described by MD trajectories it is difficult to identify, separate, and study those large-scale fluctuations. This problem can be formulated as the need to identify a small number of collective variables that guide the slow kinetic processes. Among the methods used to study the slow, leading processes in proteins' dynamics, the time-lagged independent component analysis, or tICA, has been extensively used. Recently, we developed a Langevin coarse-grained approach for the dynamics of proteins, called the Langevin Equation for Protein Dynamics or LE4PD. This approach partitions the protein's MD dynamics into…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
