Critical comparison of collisionless fluid models: Nonlinear simulations of parallel firehose instability
Taiki Jikei, Takanobu Amano

TL;DR
This paper compares two collisionless plasma fluid models through nonlinear simulations of the parallel firehose instability, highlighting differences in their ability to predict linear and long-term behaviors, emphasizing the importance of cyclotron damping.
Contribution
It provides a detailed nonlinear comparison of CGL and CRC models, demonstrating the significance of cyclotron resonance effects in collisionless plasma simulations.
Findings
CGL model better describes linear firehose instability
CRC model reproduces electromagnetic ion cyclotron instability
Long-term behaviors differ significantly between models
Abstract
Two different fluid models for collisionless plasmas are compared. One is based on the classical Chew-Goldberger-Low (CGL) model that includes a finite Larmor radius (FLR) correction and the Landau closure for the longitudinal mode. Another one takes into account the effect of cyclotron resonance in addition to Landau resonance, which is referred to as the cyclotron resonance closure (CRC) model. While the linear property of the parallel firehose instability is better described by the CGL model, the electromagnetic ion cyclotron instability driven unstable by the cyclotron resonance is reproduced only by the CRC model. Nonlinear simulation results for the parallel firehose instability performed with the two models are also discussed. Although the linear and quasilinear isotropization phases are consistent with theory in both models, long-term behaviors may be substantially different.…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
