Some features of the direct and inverse double Compton effect as applied to astrophysics
V. Dubrovich, T. Zalialiutdinov

TL;DR
This paper analyzes the inverse double Compton scattering process in astrophysics, deriving an analytical cross-section expression using QED, and highlights how the spectral characteristics of the photon source influence the process without infra-red divergences.
Contribution
It provides the first analytical expression for the inverse double Compton cross-section considering realistic photon source spectra and detailed balance, addressing infra-red divergence issues.
Findings
Inverse cross-section has no infra-red divergences at fixed photon energies.
The behavior of the inverse process depends on the spectral profile of the photon source.
The physical frequency profile is influenced by the intensity and line shape of incident radiation.
Abstract
In the present paper, we consider the process of inverse double Compton (IDC) scattering in the context of astrophysical applications. It is assumed that the two hard X-ray photons emitted from an astrophysical source are scattered on a free electron and converted into a single soft photon of optical range. Using QED S-matrix formalism for the derivation of a cross-section of direct double Compton (DDC) and assuming detailed balance conditions we give an analytical expression for the cross-section of the IDC process. It is shown that at fixed energies of incident photons the inverse cross-section has no infra-red divergences and its behavior is completely defined by the spectral characteristics of the photon source itself, in particular, by the finite interaction time of radiation with an electron. Thus, even for the direct process, the problem of resolving infrared divergence actually…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
