
TL;DR
This paper introduces a metaphorical exploration of security ceremonies as cities on a Cybersecurity planet, analyzing human factors and behaviors in different security practices to suggest improvements.
Contribution
It presents a novel metaphorical framework classifying security ceremonies into four city types, highlighting human factors and proposing new perspectives for enhancing security practices.
Findings
Democratic City allows personal practice and errors in security ceremonies.
Dictatorial City enforces strict compliance, automating user behavior.
Beautiful City features aesthetically appealing ceremonies that users follow willingly.
Abstract
Security ceremonies still fail despite decades of efforts by researchers and practitioners. Attacks are often a cunning amalgam of exploits for technical systems and of forms of human behaviour. For example, this is the case with the recent news headline of a large-scale attack against Electrum Bitcoin wallets, which manages to spread a malicious update of the wallet app. I therefore set out to look at things through a different lens. I make the (metaphorical) hypothesis that human ancestors arrived on Earth along with security ceremonies from a very far planet, the Cybersecurity planet. My hypothesis continues, in that studying (by huge telescopes) the surface of Cybersecurity in combination with the logical projection on that surface of what happens on Earth is beneficial for us earthlings. I have spotted four cities so far on the remote planet. Democratic City features security…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
