The Atacama Cosmology Telescope: Measurement and Analysis of 1D Beams for DR4
Marius Lungu, Emilie R. Storer, Matthew Hasselfield, Adriaan J., Duivenvoorden, Erminia Calabrese, Grace E. Chesmore, Steve K. Choi, Jo, Dunkley, Rolando D\"unner, Patricio A. Gallardo, Joseph E. Golec, Yilun Guan,, J. Colin Hill, Adam D. Hincks, Johannes Hubmayr

TL;DR
This paper details the precise measurement and modeling of the Atacama Cosmology Telescope's beams for DR4, including polarization leakage and sidelobe characterization, crucial for accurate cosmological data analysis.
Contribution
It introduces improved beam measurement techniques, a refined physical beam model, and enhanced calibration methods for the ACT DR4 data release.
Findings
Beam measurements achieve -40 dB accuracy in the central region.
Temperature-to-polarization leakage is quantified as <1% at 150 GHz.
Polarized sidelobes are characterized and deprojected from data.
Abstract
We describe the measurement and treatment of the telescope beams for the Atacama Cosmology Telescope's fourth data release, DR4. Observations of Uranus are used to measure the central portion (<12') of the beams to roughly -40 dB of the peak. Such planet maps in intensity are used to construct azimuthally averaged beam profiles, which are fit with a physically motivated model before being transformed into Fourier space. We investigate and quantify a number of percent-level corrections to the beams, all of which are important for precision cosmology. Uranus maps in polarization are used to measure the temperature-to-polarization leakage in the main part of the beams, which is <1% (2.5%) at 150 GHz (98 GHz). The beams also have polarized sidelobes, which are measured with observations of Saturn and deprojected from the ACT time-ordered data. Notable changes relative to past ACT beam…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
