Inelastic scattering of electrons in water from first principles: cross sections and inelastic mean free path for use in Monte Carlo track-structure simulations of biological damage
Natalia E. Koval, Peter Koval, Fabiana Da Pieve, Jorge Kohanoff,, Emilio Artacho, Dimitris Emfietzoglou

TL;DR
This paper uses ab-initio linear-response time-dependent density functional theory to calculate inelastic electron scattering properties in water, providing data for improved biological damage simulations.
Contribution
It presents the first ab-initio calculations of energy loss functions and cross sections in water, benchmarking against experimental data and offering detailed orbital contributions for Monte Carlo simulations.
Findings
Good agreement with experimental data
Detailed analysis of molecular orbital contributions
Provision of single-differential cross sections
Abstract
Modelling the inelastic scattering of electrons in water is fundamental, given their crucial role in biological damage. In Monte Carlo track-structure codes used to assess biological damage, the energy loss function, from which cross sections are extracted, is derived from different semi-empirical optical models. Only recently, first ab-initio results for the energy loss function and cross-sections in water became available. For benchmarking purpose, in this work, we present ab-initio linear-response time-dependent density functional theory calculations of the energy loss function of liquid water. We calculated the inelastic scattering cross sections, inelastic mean free paths, and electronic stopping powers and compared our results with recent calculations and experimental data showing a good agreement. In addition, we provide an in-depth analysis of the contributions of different…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
