Breaking the Rate-Loss Bound of Quantum Key Distribution with Asynchronous Two-Photon Interference
Yuan-Mei Xie, Yu-Shuo Lu, Chen-Xun Weng, Xiao-Yu Cao, Zhao-Ying Jia,, Yu Bao, Yang Wang, Yao Fu, Hua-Lei Yin, Zeng-Bing Chen

TL;DR
This paper introduces an asynchronous quantum key distribution protocol that surpasses traditional capacity limits without phase tracking or locking, enabling longer-distance secure communication with simpler experimental setup.
Contribution
The authors propose a novel asynchronous measurement-device-independent protocol that breaks the rate-loss bound without phase stabilization, using time multiplexing and postmatching techniques.
Findings
Achieves 450 km transmission distance at 1 GHz without phase tracking.
Maintains capacity surpassing the secret key limit even without phase locking at 270 km.
Higher key rates than phase-matching twin-field protocols under similar conditions.
Abstract
Twin-field quantum key distribution can overcome the secret key capacity of repeaterless quantum key distribution via single-photon interference. However, to compensate for the channel fluctuations and lock the laser fluctuations, the techniques of phase tracking and phase locking are indispensable in experiment, which drastically increase experimental complexity and hinder free-space realization. Inspired by the duality in entanglement, we herein present an asynchronous measurement-device-independent quantum key distribution protocol that can surpass the secret key capacity even without phase tracking and phase locking. Leveraging the concept of time multiplexing, asynchronous two-photon Bell-state measurement is realized by postmatching two interference detection events. For a 1 GHz system, the new protocol reaches a transmission distance of 450 km without phase tracking. After…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
