On the decomposition of an insurer's profits and losses
Marcus C. Christiansen

TL;DR
This paper develops an axiomatic framework for decomposing insurer profits and losses, revealing that infinitesimal sequential updating is theoretically justified, unlike the commonly used sequential updating method.
Contribution
It introduces an axiomatic approach that explains why infinitesimal sequential updating is the appropriate method for profit and loss decomposition.
Findings
Infinitesimal sequential updating (ISU) decompositions are theoretically justified by axioms.
Current practice often uses sequential updating (SU) instead of ISU.
The axiomatic framework applies broadly beyond insurance contexts.
Abstract
Current reporting standards for insurers require a decomposition of observed profits and losses in such a way that changes in the insurer's balance sheet can be attributed to specified risk factors. Generating such a decomposition is a nontrivial task because balance sheets generally depend on the risk factors in a non-linear way. This paper starts from an axiomatic perspective on profit and loss decompositions and finds that the axioms necessarily lead to infinitesimal sequential updating (ISU) decompositions, provided that the latter exist and are stable, whereas the current practice is rather to use sequential updating (SU) decompositions. The generality of the axiomatic approach makes the results useful also beyond insurance applications wherever profits and losses shall be additively decomposed in a risk-oriented manner.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsInsurance and Financial Risk Management · Risk and Portfolio Optimization · Insurance, Mortality, Demography, Risk Management
