On the energy source of ultra-stripped supernovae
Ryo Sawada, Kazumi Kashiyama, Yudai Suwa

TL;DR
This study investigates the energy sources of ultra-stripped supernovae through long-term simulations, nucleosynthesis calculations, and light curve analysis, revealing that some are powered by radioactive nickel decay while others may involve neutron star winds.
Contribution
It provides the first detailed modeling of ultra-stripped supernovae progenitors, nucleosynthesis, and light curves, and explores alternative energy mechanisms beyond radioactive decay.
Findings
SN2019dge can be explained by $^{56}$Ni decay from a progenitor with $M_{CO} \\lesssim 1.6 M_\\odot$.
iPTF14gqr's light curve cannot be solely explained by $^{56}$Ni decay, suggesting alternative energy sources.
A magnetar with $B_p \\sim 10^{15}$ G and $P_i \\sim 0.1$ s could power iPTF14gqr.
Abstract
Ultra-stripped supernovae (USSN) with a relatively low ejecta mass of (e.g., iPTF14gqr and SN2019dge) are considered to originate from ultra-stripped carbon-oxygen (CO) cores in close binary systems and are likely to be progenitors of binary neutron stars (BNSs). Here we conduct long-term simulations of USSNe from ultra-stripped progenitors with various masses () based on results of neutrino-radiation hydrodynamics simulations, and consistently calculate the nucleosynthesis and the SN light curves. We find that a USSN from a more massive progenitor has a larger ejecta mass but a smaller Ni mass mainly due to the fallback, which leads to the light curve being dimmer and slower. By comparing the synthetic light curves with the observed ones, we show that SN2019dge can be solely powered by Ni synthesized…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
