Axisymmetric necking versus Treloar-Kearsley instability in a hyperelastic sheet under equibiaxial stretching

TL;DR

This paper analyzes bifurcations in hyperelastic sheets under equibiaxial stretching, deriving conditions for necking and comparing it with the Treloar-Kearsley instability, supported by simulations.

Contribution

It provides a theoretical framework for understanding the critical conditions for necking versus TK instability in hyperelastic sheets, including an amplitude equation and bifurcation analysis.

Findings

Necking occurs at higher stretches than TK instability for the considered strain-energy functions.

Under force control, TK instability occurs first; under displacement control, necking is suppressed and occurs later.

Simulations confirm the theoretical bifurcation conditions and the growth process of necking.

Abstract

We consider bifurcations from the homogeneous solution of a circular or square hyperelastic sheet that is subjected to equibiaxial stretching under either force- or displacement-controlled edge conditions. We derive the condition for axisymmetric necking and show, for the class of strain-energy functions considered, that the critical stretch for necking is greater than the critical stretch for the Treloar-Kearsley (TK) instability and less than the critical stretch for the limiting-point instability. An amplitude equation for the bifurcated necking solution is derived through a weakly nonlinear analysis and is used to show that necking initiation is generally sub-critical. Abaqus simulations are conducted to verify the bifurcation conditions and the expectation that the TK instability should occur first under force control, but when the edge displacement is controlled the TK instability is suppressed, and it is the necking instability that will be observed. It is also demonstrated that axisymmetric necking follows a growth/propagation process typical of all such localization problems.