Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (FMEA) for Experimental Use of FLASH on a Clinical Accelerator

TL;DR

This study applied Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (FMEA) to identify and mitigate potential errors in converting a clinical linear accelerator to ultra-high dose rate (UHDR) FLASH mode, enhancing safety for experimental use.

Contribution

The paper demonstrates the application of FMEA to a LINAC conversion for UHDR FLASH, identifying key failure modes and proposing mitigation strategies to ensure safety.

Findings

46 potential failure modes identified

5 failure modes with RPN > 100

Mitigation strategies include checklists, robust detectors, automation, and surface guidance

Abstract

Background: Use of a linear accelerator in ultra-high dose rate (UHDR) mode can provide a conduit for wider access to UHDR FLASH effects, sparing normal tissue, but care needs to be taken in the use of such systems to ensure errors are minimized. Purpose: Failure Modes and Effects Analysis (FMEA) was carried out in a team that has been involved in converting a LINAC between clinical use and UHDR experimental mode for more than one year, following the proposed methods of TG100. Methods: A team of 9 professionals with extensive experience were polled to outline the process map and workflow for analysis, and developed fault trees for potential errors, as well as failure modes that would results. The team scored the categories of severity magnitude (S), occurrence likelihood (O), and detectability potential (D) in a scale of 1 to 10, so that a risk priority number (RPN=S*O*D) could be assessed for each. Results: A total of 46 potential failure modes were identified, including 5 with RPN>100. These failure modes involved 1) patient set up, 2) gating mechanisms in delivery, and 3) detector in the beam stop mechanism. Identified methods to mitigate errors included 1) use of a checklist post conversion, 2) use of robust radiation detectors, 3) automation of QA and beam consistency checks, and 4) implementation of surface guidance during beam delivery. Conclusions: The FMEA process was considered critically important in this setting of a new use of a LINAC, and the expert team developed a higher level of confidence in the ability to safely move UHDR LINAC use towards expanded research access.