A Predictive Autonomous Decision Aid for Calibrating Human-Autonomy Reliance in Multi-Agent Task Assignment
Larkin Heintzman, Ryan K. Williams

TL;DR
This paper introduces a game-theoretic model and an adaptive decision aid using LSTM and Bayesian filtering to calibrate human reliance in multi-agent task assignment, enhancing team performance.
Contribution
It presents a novel adaptive decision aid that calibrates human reliance through interaction sequences, improving collaboration in multi-agent systems.
Findings
Significantly improves human-autonomy interaction performance.
Outperforms myopic decision aids without reliance understanding.
Effectively adapts to human reliance dynamics.
Abstract
In this work, we develop a game-theoretic modeling of the interaction between a human operator and an autonomous decision aid when they collaborate in a multi-agent task allocation setting. In this setting, we propose a decision aid that is designed to calibrate the operator's reliance on the aid through a sequence of interactions to improve overall human-autonomy team performance. The autonomous decision aid employs a long short-term memory (LSTM) neural network for human action prediction and a Bayesian parameter filtering method to improve future interactions, resulting in an aid that can adapt to the dynamics of human reliance. The proposed method is then tested against a large set of simulated human operators from the choice prediction competition (CPC18) data set, and shown to significantly improve human-autonomy interactions when compared to a myopic decision aid that only…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsHuman-Automation Interaction and Safety · Occupational Health and Safety Research · Complex Systems and Decision Making
