Zero forcing number versus general position number in tree-like graphs
Hongbo Hua, Xinying Hua, Sandi Klav\v{z}ar

TL;DR
This paper investigates the relationship between zero forcing number and general position number in various tree-like graphs, extending known inequalities to new classes and identifying cases where the inequalities do not hold.
Contribution
It extends the inequality ${ m gp}(G) geq { m Z}(G)$ from trees to block graphs and certain quasi-trees, and explores its limitations in bicyclic graphs.
Findings
${ m gp}(T) geq { m Z}(T) + 1$ for trees
${ m gp}(G) geq { m Z}(G)$ for connected unicyclic graphs
The inequality does not extend to bicyclic graphs or all quasi-trees
Abstract
Let and be the zero forcing number and the general position number of a graph , respectively. Known results imply that holds for every nontrivial tree . It is proved that the result extends to block graphs. For connected, unicyclic graphs it is proved that . The result extends neither to bicyclic graphs nor to quasi-trees. Nevertheless, a large class of quasi-trees is found for which holds.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAdvanced Graph Theory Research · Graph theory and applications · Interconnection Networks and Systems
