Multi-step LRU: SIMD-based Cache Replacement for Lower Overhead and Higher Precision

TL;DR

This paper introduces multi-step LRU, a SIMD-based cache replacement algorithm that enhances cache hit ratios and throughput by efficiently managing cache items without additional metadata, outperforming traditional algorithms.

Contribution

The paper proposes a novel multi-step LRU algorithm that improves cache accuracy and performance using SIMD instructions without extra per-item memory overhead.

Findings

Multi-step LRU outperforms original LRU and GCLOCK in speed and cache hit ratio.

It implicitly considers access frequency and recency, improving cache effectiveness.

Results are comparable to ARC, with less metadata overhead.

Abstract

A key-value cache is a key component of many services to provide low-latency and high-throughput data accesses to a huge amount of data. To improve the end-to-end performance of such services, a key-value cache must achieve a high cache hit ratio with high throughput. In this paper, we propose a new cache replacement algorithm, multi-step LRU, which achieves high throughput by efficiently exploiting SIMD instructions without using per-item additional memory (LRU metadata) to record information such as the last access timestamp. For a small set of items that can fit within a vector register, SIMD-based LRU management without LRU metadata is known (in-vector LRU). It remembers the access history by reordering items in one vector using vector shuffle instruction. In-vector LRU alone cannot be used for a caching system since it can manage only few items. Set-associative cache is a straightforward way to build a large cache using in-vector LRU as a building block. However, a naive set-associative cache based on in-vector LRU has a poorer cache hit ratio than the original LRU although it can achieve a high throughput. Our multi-step LRU enhances naive set-associative cache based on in-vector LRU for improving cache accuracy by taking both access frequency and access recency of items into account while keeping the efficiency by SIMD instructions. Our results indicate that multi-step LRU outperforms the original LRU and GCLOCK algorithms in terms of both execution speed and cache hit ratio. Multi-step LRU improves the cache hit ratios over the original LRU by implicitly taking access frequency of items as well as access recency into account. The cache hit ratios of multi-step LRU are similar to those of ARC, which achieves a higher a cache hit ratio in a tradeoff for using more LRU metadata.