Weak diamond, weak projectivity, and transfinite extensions of simple artinian rings
Jan Trlifaj

TL;DR
This paper explores how set-theoretic principles like the Weak Diamond and CH influence the projectivity of modules over transfinite extensions of simple artinian rings, providing new insights into module theory under these conditions.
Contribution
It demonstrates that under certain set-theoretic assumptions, projectivity can be tested at specific layer epimorphisms for transfinite extensions of simple artinian rings.
Findings
Weak Diamond and CH imply projectivity testing at layer epimorphisms
Results apply to hereditary rings of size at most 2^ω
Advances understanding of module projectivity in set-theoretic context
Abstract
We apply set-theoretic methods to study projective modules and their generalizations over transfinite extensions of simple artinian rings R. When R is hereditary and of cardinality at most , we prove that the Weak Diamond and CH imply that projectivity of an arbitrary module can be tested at the layer epimorphisms of R.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsRings, Modules, and Algebras · Commutative Algebra and Its Applications · Algebraic structures and combinatorial models
