Cinderella's shoe won't fit Soundarya: An audit of facial processing tools on Indian faces
Gaurav Jain, Smriti Parsheera

TL;DR
This study evaluates the performance of four commercial facial processing tools on Indian faces, revealing significant errors in face detection, gender, and age classification, especially for women and certain age groups, highlighting limitations in current technology.
Contribution
The paper provides an empirical assessment of facial processing tools on Indian faces, exposing demographic biases and inaccuracies that are underexplored in existing research.
Findings
Gender classification error rate for Indian females up to 14.68%
Age prediction errors range from 14.3% to 42.2%
Tools show varying error rates and demographic biases
Abstract
The increasing adoption of facial processing systems in India is fraught with concerns of privacy, transparency, accountability, and missing procedural safeguards. At the same time, we also know very little about how these technologies perform on the diverse features, characteristics, and skin tones of India's 1.34 billion-plus population. In this paper, we test the face detection and facial analysis functions of four commercial facial processing tools on a dataset of Indian faces. The tools display varying error rates in the face detection and gender and age classification functions. The gender classification error rate for Indian female faces is consistently higher compared to that of males -- the highest female error rate being 14.68%. In some cases, this error rate is much higher than that shown by previous studies for females of other nationalities. Age classification errors are…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsFace recognition and analysis
