The muon g-2 anomaly confronts new physics in $e^\pm$ and $\mu^\pm$ final states scattering

TL;DR

This paper proposes that a new boson produced resonantly around the KLOE energy could explain discrepancies in muon g-2 measurements and hadronic cross-section data, reconciling experimental and theoretical differences.

Contribution

The paper introduces a simple model of a new boson that accounts for multiple anomalies in muon g-2 and hadronic cross-section measurements, unifying various experimental results.

Findings

A new boson can reconcile KLOE and BaBar data discrepancies.

The model explains the muon g-2 anomaly within phenomenological constraints.

Resonant production affects luminosity and cross-section measurements.

Abstract

The 4.2$\sigma$ discrepancy between the standard model prediction for the muon anomalous magnetic moment $a_\mu$ and the experimental result is accompanied by other anomalies. A crucial input for the prediction is the hadronic vacuum polarization $a_\mu^{\rm HVP}$ inferred from $\sigma_{\rm had} =\sigma(e^+e^- \to\,$hadrons) data. However, the two most accurate determinations of $\sigma_{\rm had}$ from KLOE and BaBar disagree by almost 3$\,\sigma$. Additionally, the combined data-driven result disagrees with the most precise lattice determination of $a_{\mu}^{\rm HVP}$ by $2.1\,\sigma$. We show that all these discrepancies could be accounted for by a new boson produced resonantly around the KLOE centre of mass energy and decaying promptly yielding $e^+e^-$ and $\mu^+\mu^-$ pairs in the final states. This gives rise to three different effects: (i) the additional $e^+e^-$ events will affect the KLOE luminosity determination based on measurements of the Bhabha cross section, and in turn the inferred value of $\sigma_{\rm had}$; (ii) the additional $\mu^+\mu^-$ events will affect the determination of $\sigma_{\rm had}$ via the (luminosity independent) measurement of the ratio of $\pi^+\pi^-\gamma$ versus $\mu^+\mu^-\gamma$ events; (iii) loops involving the new boson would contribute directly to the prediction for $a_\mu$. We discuss in detail this possibility, and we present a simple model that can reconcile the KLOE and BaBar results for $\sigma_{\rm had}$, the data-driven and the lattice determinations of $a_\mu^{\rm HVP}$, the predicted and measured values of $a_\mu$, while complying with all phenomenological constraints.