Sampling Trade-Offs in Duty-Cycled Systems for Air Quality Low-Cost Sensors
Pau Ferrer-Cid, Julio Garcia-Calvete, Aina Main-Nadal, Zhe Ye, Jose M., Barcelo-Ordinas, Jorge Garcia-Vidal

TL;DR
This paper investigates how sampling strategies in duty-cycled low-cost air quality sensors impact data quality and energy consumption, proposing optimized trade-offs for battery-powered sensor nodes.
Contribution
It analyzes the relationship between sensor sampling, calibration quality, and power use, providing experimental insights for energy-efficient air quality monitoring.
Findings
Sampling strategy affects pollution estimation accuracy.
Duty cycles of 0.1 are feasible with 2-minute response sensors.
Duty cycles of 0.01-0.02 are achievable with negligible response times.
Abstract
The use of low-cost sensors in conjunction with high-precision instrumentation for air pollution monitoring has shown promising results in recent years. One of the main challenges for these sensors has been the quality of their data, which is why the main efforts have focused on calibrating the sensors using machine learning techniques to improve the data quality. However, there is one aspect that has been overlooked, that is, these sensors are mounted on nodes that may have energy consumption restrictions if they are battery-powered. In this paper, we show the usual sensor data gathering process and we study the existing trade-offs between the sampling of such sensors, the quality of the sensor calibration, and the power consumption involved. To this end, we conduct experiments on prototype nodes measuring tropospheric ozone, nitrogen dioxide, and nitrogen monoxide at high frequency.…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
