Turbulent magnetic field amplification in binary neutron star mergers
C. Palenzuela, R. Aguilera-Miret, F. Carrasco, R. Ciolfi, J.V., Kalinani, W. Kastaun, B. Mi\~nano, D. Vigan\`o

TL;DR
This study uses advanced large-eddy simulations to investigate magnetic field amplification in binary neutron star mergers, achieving numerical convergence and revealing the magnetic field's growth and saturation dynamics post-merger.
Contribution
It introduces the application of explicit large-eddy simulations with gradient SGS models to capture small-scale dynamos in neutron star mergers, overcoming previous resolution limitations.
Findings
Magnetic fields saturate at ~10^{16} G within 5 ms after merger.
Magnetic field components grow continuously over 20-30 ms, driven by winding mechanisms.
No significant impact of magnetic fields on angular momentum redistribution was observed.
Abstract
Magnetic fields are expected to play a key role in the dynamics and the ejection mechanisms that accompany the merger of two neutron stars. General relativistic magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) simulations offer a unique opportunity to unravel the details of the ongoing physical processes. Nevertheless, current numerical studies are severely limited by the fact that any affordable resolution remains insufficient to fully capture the small-scale dynamo, initially triggered by the Kelvin-Helmholtz instability, and later sourced by several MHD processes involving differential rotation. Here, we alleviate this limitation by using explicit large-eddy simulations, a technique where the unresolved dynamics occurring at the sub-grid scales (SGS) is modeled by extra terms, which are functions of the resolved fields and their derivatives. The combination of high-order numerical schemes, high…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
