Revisiting the no-boundary proposal with a scalar field
Caroline Jonas, Jean-Luc Lehners, Vincent Meyer

TL;DR
This paper refines the no-boundary proposal by including scalar fields, showing how to eliminate unstable saddle points and exploring implications for different potential signs, with relevance to inflation and AdS spaces.
Contribution
It demonstrates a method to implement the no-boundary proposal with scalar fields, introducing regularity conditions that remove unstable saddle points and analyzing resulting geometries.
Findings
Unstable saddle points can be eliminated with regularity conditions.
Additional saddle points correspond to unclosed geometries.
Classical spacetime emerges only for inflationary potentials.
Abstract
Recent works have suggested that the no-boundary proposal should be defined as a sum over regular, not necessarily compact, metrics. We show that such a prescription can be implemented in the presence of a scalar field. For concreteness, we consider the model of Garay et al., in which the potential is a sum of exponentials, and which lends itself to an analytical treatment. Compared to the earlier implementation, we find that saddle points with unstable fluctuations can be eliminated by imposition of an appropriate regularity condition. This leads to the appearance of additional saddle points, corresponding to unclosed geometries. We argue that such saddles will occur generically, though we also find in our example that they are subdominant to the closed, Hartle-Hawking, saddle points. When the potential is positive, classical spacetime is only predicted for inflationary histories. When…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
