Comment on "A Candidate for a Supergravity Anomaly"
Friedemann Brandt

TL;DR
This paper refutes a recent claim of a new supergravity anomaly in 4D, demonstrating that such an anomaly cannot exist as it contradicts established literature and results.
Contribution
It clarifies the non-existence of the proposed supergravity anomaly, correcting a recent misinterpretation in the field.
Findings
No evidence of the proposed anomaly exists.
The claim contradicts established supergravity results.
The paper reinforces current understanding of supergravity anomalies.
Abstract
In a recent paper (arXiv:2110.06213v1) it was argued that in 4D supergravity a previously unknown candidate anomaly exists. In the present paper it is pointed out that the existence of such a candidate would contradict results available in the literature, and it is substantiated that there is no candidate anomaly of the asserted form.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsBlack Holes and Theoretical Physics · Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies · Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
