A Collatz Conjecture Proof
Robert Hill Nichols Jr

TL;DR
This paper introduces a novel recursive representation of the Collatz function, constructs a complete Collatz tree, and provides a proof of the Collatz conjecture using difference equations and the axiom of choice.
Contribution
It presents a new recursive formulation, constructs a complete Collatz tree, and offers a proof of the Collatz conjecture.
Findings
Complete Collatz tree constructed for odds not divisible by 3
Proof of the Collatz conjecture provided
Reduced subsequences contain fewer elements than original sequences
Abstract
We represent the generalized Collatz function with the recursive ruler function r(2n) = r(n) + 1 and r(2n + 1) = 1. We generate even-only and odd-only Collatz subsequences that contain significantly fewer elements term by term, to 2 and 1, respectively, than are present in the original 3n + 1 and the Terras-modified Collatz sequences. We show that a nonlinear, coupled system of difference equations yields a complete acyclic (except for the trivial cycle) Collatz tree in odds not divisible by 3 with root vertex 1. We construct a complete Collatz tree with the axiom of choice and prove the Collatz conjecture.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsBenford’s Law and Fraud Detection
