Galilean invariance without superluminal particles
Andrzej Grudka, Antoni Wojcik

TL;DR
This paper challenges the idea that quantum probabilistic dynamics imply superluminal particles, proposing an alternative interpretation of Lorentz transformations that avoids superluminal phenomena.
Contribution
It offers a reinterpretation of Lorentz transformations, removing the need for superluminal particles to explain quantum probabilistic dynamics.
Findings
Reinterprets Lorentz transformations without superluminal particles
Argues quantum dynamics do not require superluminal explanations
Provides a natural extension of relativity principles
Abstract
Recently Dragan and Ekert [New. J. Phys 22, 033038, 2020] presented arguments that probabilistic dynamics inherent in the realm of quantum physics is related to the propagation of superluminal particles. Moreover they argue that existence of such particles is a natural consequence of the principle of relativity. We show that the proposed extension of Lorentz transformation can be interpreted in natural way without invoking superluminal phenomena.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsQuantum Mechanics and Applications · Quantum Information and Cryptography · Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories
