Stable Approximation Algorithms for the Dynamic Broadcast Range-Assignment Problem

TL;DR

This paper introduces stable approximation algorithms for the dynamic broadcast range-assignment problem, balancing solution stability with approximation quality across different geometric settings.

Contribution

It develops the concept of stable approximation schemes and provides algorithms with proven stability and approximation guarantees in various geometric spaces.

Findings

In , a stable approximation scheme with tight bounds is presented.

On the circle, no stable approximation scheme exists, but solutions can be approximated.

In , stable algorithms with constant stability and approximation ratios are developed.

Abstract

Let $P$ be a set of points in $\mathbb{R}^d$, where each point $p\in P$ has an associated transmission range $\rho(p)$. The range assignment $\rho$ induces a directed communication graph $\mathcal{G}_{\rho}(P)$ on $P$, which contains an edge $(p,q)$ iff $|pq| \leq \rho(p)$. In the broadcast range-assignment problem, the goal is to assign the ranges such that $\mathcal{G}_{\rho}(P)$ contains an arborescence rooted at a designated node and whose cost $\sum_{p \in P} \rho(p)^2$ is minimized. We study trade-offs between the stability of the solution -- the number of ranges that are modified when a point is inserted into or deleted from $P$ -- and its approximation ratio. We introduce $k$-stable algorithms, which are algorithms that modify the range of at most $k$ points when they update the solution. We also introduce the concept of a stable approximation scheme (SAS). A SAS is an update algorithm that, for any given fixed parameter $\varepsilon>0$, is $k(\epsilon)$-stable and maintains a solution with approximation ratio $1+\varepsilon$, where the stability parameter $k(\varepsilon)$ only depends on $\varepsilon$ and not on the size of $P$. We study such trade-offs in three settings. - In $\mathbb{R}^1$, we present a SAS with $k(\varepsilon)=O(1/\varepsilon)$, which we show is tight in the worst case. We also present a 1-stable $(6+2\sqrt{5})$-approximation algorithm, a $2$-stable 2-approximation algorithm, and a $3$-stable $1.97$-approximation algorithm. - In $\mathbb{S}^1$ (where the underlying space is a circle) we prove that no SAS exists, even though an optimal solution can always be obtained by cutting the circle at an appropriate point and solving the resulting problem in $\mathbb{R}^1$. - In $\mathbb{R}^2$, we also prove that no SAS exists, and we present a $O(1)$-stable $O(1)$-approximation algorithm.