Comparison of topology changing update algorithms
Timo Eichhorn, Christian Hoelbling

TL;DR
This paper compares alternative algorithms like metadynamics, instanton updates, and multiscale thermalization for sampling topological sectors in lattice simulations, highlighting their potential advantages over traditional methods.
Contribution
It evaluates the effectiveness of less common algorithms in sampling topological sectors, providing insights for their application in lattice gauge theories.
Findings
Metadynamics improves tunneling between topological sectors.
Instanton updates offer efficient sector sampling.
Multiscale thermalization enhances sampling at fine lattice spacings.
Abstract
In modern lattice simulations, conventional update algorithms do not allow for tunneling between topological sectors at fine lattice spacings. We compare the viability of multiple less commonly used algorithms (metadynamics, instanton updates, and multiscale thermalization) with respect to proper sampling of all topological sectors in the Schwinger model. We briefly comment on the prospects of applying these methods to 4-dimensional SU(3) simulations.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
