Only finitely many $s$-Cullen numbers are repunits for a fixed $s\ge 2$
Michael Filaseta, Jon Grantham, Hester Graves

TL;DR
The paper proves that for any fixed integer s ≥ 2, only finitely many s-Cullen numbers can be repunits, and explicitly confirms this for all s in the range [2, 8896], using an elementary and effective proof.
Contribution
It establishes finiteness of s-Cullen numbers that are repunits for fixed s and verifies this for a large range of s through an elementary proof.
Findings
Finiteness of s-Cullen repunits for fixed s ≥ 2.
No new s-Cullen repunits found for s in [2, 8896].
Elementary and effective proof method used.
Abstract
We show that for any integer , there are only finitely many -Cullen numbers that are repunits. More precisely, for fixed , there are only finitely many integers , , and with , and such that \[C_{n,s} = ns^n + 1 = \frac{b^q -1}{b-1}.\] The proof is elementary and effective, and it is used to show that there are no -Cullen repunits, other than explicitly known ones, for all .
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAdvanced Combinatorial Mathematics · Benford’s Law and Fraud Detection · Advanced Mathematical Identities
