TL;DR
This paper introduces a correction method for analyzing irregularly sampled time series that accounts for sampling rate variations, improving the accuracy of recurrence analysis in detecting true regime shifts.
Contribution
It proposes sampling rate constrained surrogates and a correction scheme to mitigate biases caused by sampling rate variations in recurrence quantification analysis.
Findings
Corrects for sampling rate bias in recurrence analysis.
Uncovers true climate regime shifts in speleothem data.
Identifies spurious transitions caused by sampling artifacts.
Abstract
The analysis of irregularly sampled time series remains a challenging task requiring methods that account for continuous and abrupt changes of sampling resolution without introducing additional biases. The edit-distance is an effective metric to quantitatively compare time series segments of unequal length by computing the cost of transforming one segment into the other. We show that transformation costs generally exhibit a non-trivial relationship with local sampling rate. If the sampling resolution undergoes strong variations, this effect impedes unbiased comparison between different time episodes. We study the impact of this effect on recurrence quantification analysis, a framework that is well-suited for identifying regime shifts in nonlinear time series. A constrained randomization approach is put forward to correct for the biased recurrence quantification measures. This strategy…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
