The design and performance of GRD onboard the GECAM satellite
Z. H. An, X. L. Sun, D. L. Zhang, S. Yang, X. Q. Li, X. Y. Wen,, K.Gong, X. H. Liang, X. J. Liu, Y. Q. Liu, Y. G. Li, S. L. Xiong, Y. B. Xu,, Fan Zhang, X. Y. Zhao, C. Cai, Z. Chang, G. Chen, C. Chen, Y. Y. Du, P. Y., Feng, M. Gao, R. Gao, D. Y. Guo, J. J. He, D. J. Hou

TL;DR
This paper details the design, assembly, and testing of gamma-ray detectors for the GECAM satellite, demonstrating their performance stability and energy resolution suitability for space applications.
Contribution
It presents a specific design scheme for LaBr3 crystal-based gamma-ray detectors, optimized assembly procedures, and validation through performance and vibration tests.
Findings
Energy resolution <16% at 59.5 keV
Detectors maintain stable performance after vibration tests
Design meets satellite scientific performance requirements
Abstract
Background: Each GECAM satellite payload contains 25 gamma-ray detectors (GRDs), which can detect gamma-rays and particles and can roughly localize the Gamma-Ray Bursts (GRBs). GRD was designed using lanthanum bromide (LaBr3) crystal as the sensitive material with the rear end coupled with silicon photomultiplier (SiPM) array for readout. Purpose: In aerospace engineering design of GRD, there are many key points to be studied. In this paper, we present the specific design scheme of GRD, the assembly and the performance test results of detectors. Methods: Based on Monte Carlo simulation and experimental test results, the specific schematic design and assembling process ofGRDwere optimized. After being fully assembled, theGRDswere conducted performance tests by using radioactive source and also conducted random vibration tests. Result and conclusion: The test results show that all…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
