Hypotheses for Triton's Plumes: New Analyses and Future Remote Sensing Tests
Jason D. Hofgartner, Samuel P. D. Birch, Julie Castillo, Will M., Grundy, Candice J. Hansen, Alexander G. Hayes, Carly J. A. Howett, Terry A., Hurford, Emily S. Martin, Karl L. Mitchell, Tom A. Nordheim, Michael J., Poston, Louise M. Prockter, Lynnae C. Quick, Paul Schenk

TL;DR
This paper compares hypotheses for Triton's plumes, analyzing their plausibility based on current understanding and proposing five remote sensing tests to distinguish among them in future missions.
Contribution
It introduces new arguments against the solar-powered eruption hypothesis and proposes five specific tests for future spacecraft to determine the true plume mechanism.
Findings
Locations of plumes and fans are not strong evidence for solar-powered hypothesis
All three eruption hypotheses remain plausible and should be further investigated
Five independent tests are proposed for future remote sensing observations
Abstract
At least two active plumes were observed on Neptune's moon Triton during the Voyager 2 flyby in 1989. Models for Triton's plumes have previously been grouped into five hypotheses, two of which are primarily atmospheric phenomena and are generally considered unlikely, and three of which include eruptive processes and are plausible. These hypotheses are compared, including new arguments, such as comparisons based on current understanding of Mars, Enceladus, and Pluto. An eruption model based on a solar-powered, solid-state greenhouse effect was previously considered the leading hypothesis for Triton's plumes, in part due to the proximity of the plumes to the subsolar latitude during the Voyager 2 flyby and the distribution of Triton's fans that are putatively deposits from former plumes. The other two eruption hypotheses are powered by internal heat, not solar insolation. Based on new…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
