Probabilistic vs deterministic gamblers
Laurent Bienvenu, Valentino Delle Rose, Tomasz Steifer

TL;DR
This paper explores the limits of probabilistic versus deterministic strategies in gambling within the framework of algorithmic randomness, introducing a new notion of almost everywhere computable randomness and demonstrating key separations.
Contribution
It introduces the concept of almost everywhere computable randomness and establishes its separation from partial computable randomness in certain Turing degrees.
Findings
Constructed a sequence that is partial computably random but not a.e. computably random.
Proved the separation between a.e. computable randomness and partial computable randomness.
Identified the exact Turing degrees where this separation occurs.
Abstract
Can a probabilistic gambler get arbitrarily rich when all deterministic gamblers fail? We study this problem in the context of algorithmic randomness, introducing a new notion -- almost everywhere computable randomness. A binary sequence is a.e.\ computably random if there is no probabilistic computable strategy which is total and succeeds on for positive measure of oracles. Using the fireworks technique we construct a sequence which is partial computably random but not a.e.\ computably random. We also prove the separation between a.e.\ computable randomness and partial computable randomness, which happens exactly in the uniformly almost everywhere dominating Turing degrees.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
