A quantum processor based on coherent transport of entangled atom arrays
Dolev Bluvstein, Harry Levine, Giulia Semeghini, Tout T. Wang, Sepehr, Ebadi, Marcin Kalinowski, Alexander Keesling, Nishad Maskara, Hannes Pichler,, Markus Greiner, Vladan Vuletic, Mikhail D. Lukin

TL;DR
This paper presents a scalable quantum processor using neutral atom arrays with dynamic, nonlocal connectivity, enabling programmable entanglement and quantum error correction across multiple qubits in two dimensions.
Contribution
The authors demonstrate a quantum architecture that coherently transports entangled atoms in 2D, allowing for complex entangled states and error correction codes, advancing scalable quantum computing.
Findings
Realized programmable generation of entangled graph states.
Implemented surface and toric code states with 19 and 24 qubits.
Measured entanglement entropy, observing non-monotonic dynamics.
Abstract
The ability to engineer parallel, programmable operations between desired qubits within a quantum processor is central for building scalable quantum information systems. In most state-of-the-art approaches, qubits interact locally, constrained by the connectivity associated with their fixed spatial layout. Here, we demonstrate a quantum processor with dynamic, nonlocal connectivity, in which entangled qubits are coherently transported in a highly parallel manner across two spatial dimensions, in between layers of single- and two-qubit operations. Our approach makes use of neutral atom arrays trapped and transported by optical tweezers; hyperfine states are used for robust quantum information storage, and excitation into Rydberg states is used for entanglement generation. We use this architecture to realize programmable generation of entangled graph states such as cluster states and a…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
