Fetus dose calculation during proton therapy of pregnant phantoms using MCNPX and MCNP6.2 codes
Marijke De Saint-Hubert (1), Katarzyna Tyminska (2), Liliana, Stolarczyk (3, 4), Hrvoje Brkic (5) ((1) Belgian Nuclear Research Centre (SCK, CEN), Mol, Belgium; (2) National Centre for Nuclear Research, Otwock, Poland;, (3) DCPT, Denmark; (4) Cyclotron Centre Bronowice IFJ PAN

TL;DR
This study uses Monte Carlo simulations with MCNPX and MCNP6.2 to accurately estimate fetal dose during proton therapy in pregnant women, highlighting the importance of phantom selection and particle contributions.
Contribution
It provides a comparative analysis of MCNPX and MCNP6.2 codes for fetal dose calculation in pregnant phantoms during proton therapy, including the impact of phantom geometry.
Findings
Fetal dose ranged from 0.4 to 0.8 μSv/Gy depending on the phantom.
Neutrons contributed the majority of the fetal dose, with photons accounting for about 20%.
Differences between code versions and phantoms affected dose estimates by up to 6% and a factor of two, respectively.
Abstract
Radiotherapy of pregnant cancer patients is not common, but when applied accurate assessment of the fetus dose is required, especially since the treatment planning systems are not able and do not allow accurate assessment of out-of-field doses. Proton therapy significantly reduces out-of-field doses, such as dose to the fetus, when compared to the photon radiotherapy techniques and as such could be promising for pregnant cancer patients. Within this study Monte Carlo calculations are performed on the three different computational phantoms representing pregnant women, all in second trimester of pregnancy. Simplified proton beam to the pregnant women brain was modelled, and the total dose equivalent (normalized per target dose) to the fetus was calculated. Between MCNPX and MCNP6.2 code versions we observed up to 6% difference. In this work 3 groups participated and the variation between…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
