Monte Carlo calculation of organ and effective dose rates from ground contaminated by Am 241: Results of an international intercomparison exercise
J Eakins, C Huet, H Brki\'c, K Capello, L Desorgher, L Epstein, J G, Hunt, H S Kim, D Krstic, Y-K Lee, M Manohari, D Nikezic, R H Shukrun, D., Souza-Santos, K. Tymi\'nska

TL;DR
This study evaluates the accuracy of Monte Carlo simulations in calculating organ and effective dose rates from ground contamination by Am 241 through an international intercomparison exercise involving multiple participants.
Contribution
It provides a comparative analysis of Monte Carlo modeling accuracy across different groups using anthropomorphic voxel phantoms in a standardized scenario.
Findings
Effective dose rates agree with reference within uncertainties in some cases.
Significant variability observed among participants' dose calculations.
Revisions improved agreement but inconsistencies remained.
Abstract
An intercomparison exercise is described that examines Monte Carlo modelling of anthropomorphic voxel phantoms in an idealized ground-contamination photon exposure scenario. Thirteen participants calculated and submitted organ and effective dose rates for comparison against a set of verified reference solutions. The effective dose rates are shown to agree with the reference value to within reasonable statistical uncertainties in five of the cases, though in only one of those was similar agreement also demonstrated in the evaluation of all requested organ dose rates. Orders-of-magnitude differences in doses are seen for some of the other participants, both internally within their own dataset and also relative to the reference solutions. Following limited feedback and suggestions from the organizer, up to two sets of revised solutions were resubmitted by some of the participants; these…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
